<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028">bug 60028</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:dawitbro@sbcglobal.net" title="Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net>"> <span class="fn">Dave Witbrodt</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=73843" name="attach_73843" title="diff of attempt to partially revert problem commit">attachment 73843</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=73843&action=edit" title="diff of attempt to partially revert problem commit">[details]</a></span>
diff of attempt to partially revert problem commit
Naive attempt to revert
My first attempt to revert the patch revealed to be the problem
above did not work. (A diff of the changes is attached.) The
problem commit touched evergreen_cs.c and r600_cs.c, and since I
have Evergreen Juniper hardware I only reverted the code in
evergreen_cs.c. The kernel built using this approach still
leaked memory.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>