<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Savage 2 Edges render white [r600g]"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63579#c18">Comment # 18</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Savage 2 Edges render white [r600g]"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63579">bug 63579</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:idr@freedesktop.org" title="Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org>"> <span class="fn">Ian Romanick</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=63579#c17">comment #17</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=63579#c16">comment #16</a>)
> > Making the support general (instead of just for preprocessor directives)
> > simplified the code greatly. Since I'm responsible for maintaining this
> > code base as my job, that's a strong incentive for me.
>
> I'm sorry if this is a bit blunt, but wow. That's one of the least appealing
> arguments I've heard in a long time. Not only is someone paying you for your
> time, you think that's a *justification* for not supporting the standard?
> That's pretty much the oppositte of how this usually works.
>
> So, as a paying customer of Intel, where would I file a bug-report that
> Intel will deal with in a responsible way?</span >
What are you talking about? This game works on the i965 driver. I'm sorry
that you don't think the maintainability of a multimillion line code base is an
appealing argument.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>