<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - r600g causes KWin crashes with kernel 3.8" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61182#c41">Comment # 41</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - r600g causes KWin crashes with kernel 3.8" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61182">bug 61182</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:niels_ole@salscheider-online.de" title="Niels Ole Salscheider <niels_ole@salscheider-online.de>"> Niels Ole Salscheider</a> <pre>As I said before, the dma_fill function is based on dma_copy and I tried to keep the diff small. But you are right, this could be improved. > Have you created a patch to get these functions called in place of the > currently broken code? I did but I was missing the context that is needed to call the dma_fill function. You can try Marek's patches on the mailing list, they work well for me. You can try to replace the call to util_blitter_clear_buffer with the dma_fill version if you are interested in it. But I don't think that you will see any noticeable difference (given the assumtion that the dma version works).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>