<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - mesa +r600 llvm = segfault"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63632#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - mesa +r600 llvm = segfault"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63632">bug 63632</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tstellar@gmail.com" title="Tom Stellard <tstellar@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Tom Stellard</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=63632#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=63632#c2">comment #2</a>)
> > I can't reproduce this with LLVM r179895 and Mesa
> > 12eab7cc564a6928197f9b87ded9e368e56976f0
> >
> > Have you done full rebuilds of both projects?
>
> Yes, I always do make [dist]clean and git clean -dfx.
>
> I have just deleted both trees and re-cloned to be sure, but the segfault is
> still there.
>
> When I was on my working commits moving either llvm or mesa to head while
> keeping the other on "working" produced the segfault (which is why I didn't
> do a proper bisect).
>
> I always clean and rebuild mesa after llvm has changed.</span >
I was able to reproduce this on my gentoo system, but not on either of my
fedora systems. I will investigate further, what distro are you using?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>