<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - power_profile not working for HD5650" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65091#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - power_profile not working for HD5650" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65091">bug 65091</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:swanson@ukfsn.org" title="Alan Swanson <swanson@ukfsn.org>"> Alan Swanson</a> <pre>You can try my patch *if* you have good cooling as Alex indicated (on IRC) he would not be applying the patch due to potential overheating. We're all still awaiting the lawyers "review" of improved power manangement code. <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-May/039247.html">http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-May/039247.html</a> My patch didn't include memory clocks as I'm running an APU rather than a discrete card so could not test. So if you add a max_mclk setting, note to guard it with an "if !(rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_IGP)" in radeon_pm_get_max_clocks(). Unsurprisingly my frame rates improved over 100% from the default 200MHz but idles back down on DPMS off with the auto power profile.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>