<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED --- - JUNIPER UVD accelerated playback of MPEG 1/2 streams does not work"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66450#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED --- - JUNIPER UVD accelerated playback of MPEG 1/2 streams does not work"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66450">bug 66450</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:deathsimple@vodafone.de" title="Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>"> <span class="fn">Christian König</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=66450#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=66450#c2">comment #2</a>)
> > The vdpauinfo output is wrong, JUNIPER has an uvd 2.3 block and that can't
> > decode MPEG2 in vld mode.
>
> So the wikipedia article is wrong?
>
> "The UVD 2 features full bitstream decoding of H.264/MPEG-4 AVC, VC-1, as
> well as MPEG2 video streams, and in addition it also supports dual video
> stream decoding and Picture-in-Picture mode. This makes UVD2 full BD-Live
> compliant."
>
> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Video_Decoder#UVD_2">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Video_Decoder#UVD_2</a></span >
Yeah, that is complete nonsense. The MVC comment for UVD 3.0 is wrong also.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>