<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - evergreen: after resume from suspend-to-ram operation is really slow with the latest DPM changes + gpu lockup" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67002#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - evergreen: after resume from suspend-to-ram operation is really slow with the latest DPM changes + gpu lockup" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67002">bug 67002</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:agd5f@yahoo.com" title="Alex Deucher <agd5f@yahoo.com>"> Alex Deucher</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=67002#c5">comment #5</a>) > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=67002#c4">comment #4</a>) > > The atombios messages are due to <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Atombios stuck in a look during resume" href="show_bug.cgi?id=67043">bug 67043</a>. You can revert the patch > > referenced in that bug to fix that. danvet supposed has a v2 of that patch > > which doesn't break resume. > > > > Also, does it work any better if you drop all the pm-suspend quirks? You > > shouldn't need them for KMS. > > ok, so reverting the original patch and applying the attached one is the > correct order ? or shall it be applied to current source ? - (probably the > former) - will try > Either revert the original or apply the new patch, but don't do both. The new patch contains the revert.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>