<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - audio broken in 24Hz/24p since 3.11 (regression)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69675#c42">Comment # 42</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - audio broken in 24Hz/24p since 3.11 (regression)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69675">bug 69675</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:pierre-bugzilla@ossman.eu" title="Pierre Ossman <pierre-bugzilla@ossman.eu>"> Pierre Ossman</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=69675#c41">comment #41</a>) > I think with a) the "table" was used and with b) the values were calculated. > So both seem fine. I am a bit afraid with the "out of spec" values - but it > did not harm here and the kernel print did not happen. Actually, I believe with a) the sw values (table, calculated or otherwise) are ignored and the hw does its own thing. With b) you will most likely use the table since all common modes will be in that table. So the calculation was most likely never tested. As for the out of spec one, that would be 640x480 at 60/1.001 Hz.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>