<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - GPU lockups with kernel 3.11.0 / 3.12-rc1 (with bug 68235's patches applied) when dpm=1 on r600g (Cayman)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69723#c35">Comment # 35</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - GPU lockups with kernel 3.11.0 / 3.12-rc1 (with bug 68235's patches applied) when dpm=1 on r600g (Cayman)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69723">bug 69723</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com" title="Alexandre Demers <alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com>"> Alexandre Demers</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=69723#c34">comment #34</a>) > I may have to withdraw what I said earlier about stability on high > performance. I had fixed it to high to launch a piglit run, after doing the > same thing at low performance, and it eventually hanged. Now, was it related > to a dpm problem or to a piglit hitting a bug (see <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - texelFetch segfault in libLLVM-3.3.so (on Cayman)" href="show_bug.cgi?id=71859">bug 71859</a>), I can't tell > right now? They may even be related. > > I was trying to confirm that I have different results when doing a piglit > run while using high performance VS low performance. > > I'll give some updates later. To be noted: I was using a balanced power state this time, not a performance power state. To be investigated.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>