<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - radeon_pm_info should be in sysfs instead of debugfs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73047#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED --- - radeon_pm_info should be in sysfs instead of debugfs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73047">bug 73047</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:deathsimple@vodafone.de" title="Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>"> Christian König</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=73047#c5">comment #5</a>) > Are the minutes of those discussions available somewhere? I'm curious about > the arguments. radeon_pm_info is not the real hardware state, but rather the state the kernel driver thinks the hardware is in. So it's actually not very useful to an end user, except if you want to debug the different states the kernel driver can be into (UVD/performance/battery etc...) I agree that we need a proper sysfs interface to make certain PM functions and informations available to userspace, but it's definitely not what's inside radeon_pm_info.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>