<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [AMD Fusion E-350] HDMI refresh rates doesn't match expectations"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76564#c12">Comment # 12</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [AMD Fusion E-350] HDMI refresh rates doesn't match expectations"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76564">bug 76564</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:deathsimple@vodafone.de" title="Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>"> <span class="fn">Christian König</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76564#c10">comment #10</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76564#c8">comment #8</a>)
> > Okay, but doesnt that mean in this case it is a problem with the display
> > (HDMI?) clock, as I am not using HDMI audio?
> >
> > Is there a way I could get more detailed logging of what is happening on my
> > system?
>
> I don't know how XBMC calculates the frame rate off hand. The PLL used to
> generate the display clock may not always match the exact pixel clock of the
> monitor. The driver calculates pll dividers to get as close as possible to
> the pixel clock of the display mode. See radeon_compute_pll_avivo() in
> radeon_display.c</span >
Yeah, but on multiple occasions I had the feeling that fglrx might do a better
job on this than the radeon kernel module.
We might want to take a second look at this and try to compare the settings
fglrx and radeon uses for the same mode.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>