<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [AMD Fusion E-350] HDMI refresh rates doesn't match expectations" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76564#c19">Comment # 19</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [AMD Fusion E-350] HDMI refresh rates doesn't match expectations" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76564">bug 76564</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jeroenk61@hotmail.com" title="jeroen <jeroenk61@hotmail.com>"> jeroen</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76564#c16">comment #16</a>) > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76564#c15">comment #15</a>) > > I got the results with fglrx: > > PPLL1@50Hz: fb=23.7 ref=2 post=6 > > <a href="mailto:PPLL1@23.976Hz">PPLL1@23.976Hz</a>: fb=23.7 ref=2 post=12 > > > > PPLL2 does seem to be used as it does not change. PPLL1 has different values > > than with the radeon OSS driver. What does this mean? > > > (100Mhz * 23.7) / (2 * 6) = 197.5Mhz > > (100Mhz * 23.7) / (2 * 12) = 98.75Mhz > > Maybe fglrx is using different modelines with a different display clock? > Can you print what modes are being used with fglrx and radeon? E.g., xrandr > --verbose. I attached both xrandr outputs. I also noticed that for fgrlx the PLL values are the same for 50Hz,60Hz and 59.94Hz output.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>