<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [AMD Fusion E-350] HDMI refresh rates doesn't match expectations" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76564#c52">Comment # 52</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - [AMD Fusion E-350] HDMI refresh rates doesn't match expectations" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76564">bug 76564</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jeroenk61@hotmail.com" title="jeroen <jeroenk61@hotmail.com>"> jeroen</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=76564#c51">comment #51</a>) > This bugtracker is not about fglrx. Not a single thing will change for the > radeon oss driver cause of such statements. > > At the end - before we dropped support for it (xvba + fglrx) - it was not > even able to hold vsync without one core at 100%. So that's not any > alternative at all. > > Btw. such comments are really distracting, as we never had that good support > from AMD as we get from christian and alex right now. </offtopic> Then you misunderstand me! I think it is really good that radeon OSS is getting so much support. I never said I want fgrlx back. It is just that comments like "a wrong speed does NOT have direct influence on dropped or skipped frames." are not helping without any explanation and are not constructive. Most people on this mailing list have probably no idea how XBMC internally works making it difficult to help us. </offtopic></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>