<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [bisected] moving moire starting with "drm/radeon: improve PLL params if we don't match exactly v2""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77673#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [bisected] moving moire starting with "drm/radeon: improve PLL params if we don't match exactly v2""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77673">bug 77673</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:deathsimple@vodafone.de" title="Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>"> <span class="fn">Christian König</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=77673#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=77673#c6">comment #6</a>)
> > Please try the attached patch.
> >
> > We now always use the fixed reference divider if both RADEON_PLL_USE_REF_DIV
> > and RADEON_PLL_USE_FRAC_FB_DIV are set.
> >
> > If only RADEON_PLL_USE_REF_DIV is set then we only use the fixed value as
> > minimum limit.
>
> Does that make sense? Wouldn't we want to use use the fixed value if
> RADEON_PLL_USE_REF_DIV regardless of whether RADEON_PLL_USE_FRAC_FB_DIV is
> set?</span >
I don't really know, it's just the way how the old code handled this.
If RADEON_PLL_USE_REF_DIV was set the RADEON_PLL_USE_FRAC_FB_DIV branch just
used the value as provided, but the none RADEON_PLL_USE_FRAC_FB_DIV branch
still tried to increment the vale.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>