<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [HAWAII] Running some programs, when HW acceleration is on, causes X to spike in CPU usage → unresponsive desktop"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82055#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [HAWAII] Running some programs, when HW acceleration is on, causes X to spike in CPU usage → unresponsive desktop"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82055">bug 82055</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:kai@dev.carbon-project.org" title="Kai <kai@dev.carbon-project.org>"> <span class="fn">Kai</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=82055#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=82055#c4">comment #4</a>)
> > Yes, Twitch, like YouTube, requires Flash.
>
> Actually, YouTube doesn't require Flash, at least not for many videos.</span >
If I go by top, then the CPU usage of the plugin container spikes for all
videos on YouTube (usually to about 30-50% on one core with Flash HW
acceleration enabled). But as <<a href="https://www.youtube.com/html5">https://www.youtube.com/html5</a>> tells me I'm
using the default player, that doesn't seem too surprising.
<span class="quote">> > > Does doing anything in particular trigger it in MediathekView?
> >
> > Sort of: just starting is enough. You get the grey window background at
> > below average speed and then it takes seconds until the UI elements are
> > drawn (list of shows, filter boxes, buttons). Afterwards you can trigger a
> > new CPU spike by trying to click anything or even better on each
> > keypress/character input into the title filter field on the left.
>
> I can reproduce this with glamor from xserver 1.16.0, but not from current
> xserver Git master. So at least that part is already fixed.</span >
Oh, nice. Do you know which commit resolves this? If not, do you need a bisect?
If yes, will that commit be backported to the 1.16 branch?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>