<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Random crashes on RadeonSI with Chromium."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81644#c82">Comment # 82</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Random crashes on RadeonSI with Chromium."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81644">bug 81644</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:aaronbottegal@gmail.com" title="Aaron B <aaronbottegal@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Aaron B</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I'm still bisecting, but I just want to say I suck at it and I'll probably need
at least 2 bisects to the same point, if not more. I'm trying to be patient,
but on the old Mesa's the glitch just takes so long to do, even when I set it
up to do it.
So, should I skip to bisecting if this DMA patch that was just proposed is the
source of our problem, also?
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - si_dma_copy_tile causes GPU hangs"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=83500">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83500</a></pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>