<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Random crashes on RadeonSI with Chromium." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81644#c126">Comment # 126</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - Random crashes on RadeonSI with Chromium." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81644">bug 81644</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:deathsimple@vodafone.de" title="Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>"> Christian König</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=81644#c119">comment #119</a>) > Small question Alex Deucher or Christian may answer: is it normal ring 5 is > completely in a different GPU's memory address area? > [ 9.353518] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 0 use gpu addr > 0x00000000c0000c00 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c00 > [ 9.353519] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 1 use gpu addr > 0x00000000c0000c04 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c04 > [ 9.353521] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 2 use gpu addr > 0x00000000c0000c08 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c08 > [ 9.353522] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 3 use gpu addr > 0x00000000c0000c0c and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c0c > [ 9.353524] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 4 use gpu addr > 0x00000000c0000c10 and cpu addr 0xffff880411a25c10 > [ 9.356425] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 5 use gpu addr > 0x0000000000075a18 and cpu addr 0xffffc90015fb5a18 > > rings 0 to 4 are all in the same gpu address subset, but not ring 5? Yes that's perfectly normal. Ring 5 is the UVD ring and that needs to have it's fence in the first 256MB of VRAM.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>