<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Long pauses with Unreal demo Elemental on R9270X since : Always flush the HDP cache before submitting a CS to the GPU" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84662#c21">Comment # 21</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Long pauses with Unreal demo Elemental on R9270X since : Always flush the HDP cache before submitting a CS to the GPU" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84662">bug 84662</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com" title="Alexandre Demers <alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com>"> Alexandre Demers</a> <pre>(In reply to Andy Furniss from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=84662#c18">comment #18</a>) > (In reply to Andy Furniss from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=84662#c14">comment #14</a>) > > > With mesa on the commit before > > r600g,radeonsi: Set RADEON_GEM_NO_CPU_ACCESS flag for tiled BOs > > (I don't know yet exactly what mesa commit changed things) > > > > I can with your patch or the stream revert get "good" behavior, this was > > with a kernel on the "bad" HPD kernel commit. > > > > Will test more over time. > > I haven't tried the patch yet. will do but I got some strange results last > thing yesterday which will make me hesitant about declaring any patch good > or bad. > > I started resetting around in mesa and noticed unexpected goods - so I tried > head and got a good noth with and without 1st patch. > > Rebooted into 3.17-rc7 still good. > > Did some recompiling of llvm/mesa as I had changed my normal setup slightly > - got bad. > > Repeated resetting mesa to older + patch got good, reset to head again, bad. > Applied patch on head good, reversed patch on head - still good. > > I am wondering at this time whether card is in some nice state so power > cycle - still good. Boot into 3.18 still good, clean & recompile the same > mesa without doing anything else - bad again. Still bad after power cycles. > > I always make distclean + git clean -dfx when doing anything other than > applying or reversing a patch. > > So it seems that there is some randomness whether I am good or bad between > mesa build/installs. > > This does not however tally with my kernel bisect which seemed to go > flawlessly. > > I assume there is no card state that can survive power off. > > So currently a bit confused - as reported by Christoph in the other bug, it > is possible to have good with vanilla mesa/kernel, but apparently for me the > "same" mesa can also be bad. > > I did try more clean/rebuild cycles including single thread but am currently > still bad. I'm also seeing this behavior while bisecting a different bug on a 7950... Probably related...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>