<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785#c37">Comment # 37</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785">bug 72785</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:tstellar@gmail.com" title="Tom Stellard <tstellar@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Tom Stellard</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Linux User from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=72785#c36">comment #36</a>)
<span class="quote">> Got similar issues when trying scrypt. I have relatively recent bfgminer (~1
> month old git build) and more or less recent graphics stack: 3.17 kernel,
> mesa 10.4 pre-release from Oibaf PPA and LLVM 3.5.1
>
> I have bunch of HD5000 based cards, mostly HD5750/5770 and somesuch and R9
> 270. Tests have shown bfgminer performs correctly when computing SHA256 and
> goes about 80% of catalyst at 57xx and even better than that on R9 270.
>
> However things are much worse when it comes to scrypt. I got impression open
> driver can get issues if something aggressively using GPU VRAM.
>
> Some observations about open drivers stack so far:
> - If you set scrypt intensity too high, there is high risk GPU would lock up
> in fatal way and crash (can happen on both 57xx and R9).
> </span >
Do you have an X server running? One cause of lockups is bfgminer hogging the
GPU, and X not being able to do anything. I recommend trying without an X
server. For best results when not using an X server, enable render nodes in
the kernel by adding drm.rnodes=1 to your kernel command line.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>