<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Setting Refresh Rate on monitor causes flickering/artifacting" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89198#c17">Comment # 17</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - Setting Refresh Rate on monitor causes flickering/artifacting" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89198">bug 89198</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:andre35822@yahoo.com" title="andre35822@yahoo.com">andre35822@yahoo.com</a> <pre>(In reply to Alex Deucher from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89198#c14">comment #14</a>) > (In reply to andre35822 from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89198#c13">comment #13</a>) > > Just thought I would post a little update, I am in the process of getting my > > system to use the new kernel. Ive already compiled it with the patch and > > stuff, i am just having a bit of trouble creating a ramdisk (I am followeing > > the arch linux wiki) although I will figure it out. Will the fixes from > > <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89198#c19">comment 19</a> and 20 be implemented into the next release of video-ati or does > > it still need testing? I am asking this so that if I know it isn't I may as > > well compile another kernel with the patches from 19 and 20. Thank you btw > > for everything. > > FWIW, using make install in your kernel tree will usually handle the ramdisk > update, but I'm not that familiar with arch, so if you are comfortable with > that, I'd stick with that. > > As for the patches from 19 and 20, I'm pretty confident they will work, but > it would be nice to get some confirmation. Alright so I tried out the kernel I compiled with the patch from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89198#c15">comment 15</a> on the other bug report, and either I didn't install the patch correctly (or it didnt install correctly) or the patch is not solving the problem. I am still getting the flickering/artifacts. I have attached an xorg log and dmesg log and added <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89198#c15">comment15</a>_patch to each of their file names so they are easily distinguishable. Should I be compiling another kernel with the patches from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89198#c19">comment 19</a> and 20?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>