<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Firefox crashing xserver and some major rendering bugs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89034#c34">Comment # 34</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Firefox crashing xserver and some major rendering bugs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89034">bug 89034</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:michel@daenzer.net" title="Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>"> Michel Dänzer</a> <pre>(In reply to smoki from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89034#c33">comment #33</a>) > glsl-fs-min is one of the random failing tests actually, it sometimes pass > sometimes fail with or without subreg liveness, so that is not problem here > i think. I can't reproduce random failures with glsl-fs-min nor any piglit regressions with sub-register liveness enabled, but sub-register liveness doesn't seem to result in any code difference for glsl-fs-min anyway. Can you find another test which consistently passes without sub-register liveness and fails with it *and* shows a difference between them in the R600_DEBUG=vs,ps stderr output, and attach the latter for both cases?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>