<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Firefox crashing xserver and some major rendering bugs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89034#c35">Comment # 35</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Firefox crashing xserver and some major rendering bugs" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89034">bug 89034</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:smoki00790@gmail.com" title="smoki <smoki00790@gmail.com>"> smoki</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=113809" name="attach_113809" title="subreg_disabled.txt">attachment 113809</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=113809&action=edit" title="subreg_disabled.txt">[details]</a> subreg_disabled.txt (In reply to Michel Dänzer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89034#c34">comment #34</a>) > > I can't reproduce random failures with glsl-fs-min nor any piglit > regressions with sub-register liveness enabled, but sub-register liveness > doesn't seem to result in any code difference for glsl-fs-min anyway. > I can't too if i run it alone, so there is no difference, it just fail sometimes in full piglit run. > > Can you find another test which consistently passes without sub-register > liveness and fails with it *and* shows a difference between them in the > R600_DEBUG=vs,ps stderr output, and attach the latter for both cases? As i said yesterday <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89034#c33">comment 33</a> i trimmed down only ones which shows this regression, you can pick any of those 136 test which shows difference. Let say: R600_DEBUG=vs,ps ./bin/copy-pixels -samples=8 -auto Outputs attached, first without...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>