<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Rv6xx dpm problems"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66963#c265">Comment # 265</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Rv6xx dpm problems"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66963">bug 66963</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:kap3tan@gmail.com" title="Kajzer <kap3tan@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Kajzer</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Alex Deucher from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=66963#c264">comment #264</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Kajzer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=66963#c263">comment #263</a>)
> > git bisect visualize
> > commit 6101b3ae94b4f266456308824e9ca4eab1235d1a
> > Author: Alex Deucher <<a href="mailto:alexander.deucher@amd.com">alexander.deucher@amd.com</a>>
> > Date: Tue Aug 19 11:54:15 2014 -0400
> >
> > drm/radeon: fix active cu count for SI and CIK
> >
> > This fixes the CU count reported to userspace for
> > OpenCL.
> >
> > bug:
> > <a href="https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82581">https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82581</a>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <<a href="mailto:alexander.deucher@amd.com">alexander.deucher@amd.com</a>>
> > Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <<a href="mailto:michel.daenzer@amd.com">michel.daenzer@amd.com</a>>
> > Cc: <a href="mailto:stable@vger.kernel.org">stable@vger.kernel.org</a>
>
> Something must have gone wrong in your bisect. That commit does not affect
> your chip. Perhaps the bug is somewhat hard to reproduce which caused you
> to mis-mark some commits as good.</span >
Could be the case. Bug is hard to reproduce because it happens only in games
and at random intervals. And you can't idle it. Sadly I don't have much time
for gaming now. I'll try it one more time, more thoroughly.
One question though, if I'm 100% positive that v3.16 is good, should I skip
bisects (mark them as good) if they end up as 3.16.0+ image after bisect ?
Thus testing only v3.17 bisects.
Because out of 7 steps 3 were from 3.17, it can save a lot of time if I could
skip 3.16 bisects.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>