<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - "LLVM triggered Diagnostic Handler: unsupported call to function ldexpf in main" when starting race in stuntrally"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92709#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - "LLVM triggered Diagnostic Handler: unsupported call to function ldexpf in main" when starting race in stuntrally"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92709">bug 92709</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:michel@daenzer.net" title="Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>"> <span class="fn">Michel Dänzer</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Matt Arsenault from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92709#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> It seems bizarre that an llvm intrinsic would ever be changed to something
> involving a library call.</span >
I think the exp2 -> ldexpf transform is rather questionable for us anyway,
since we have a native exp2 instruction, isn't it? Maybe we just don't want to
use the LibCallSimplifier pass? The comment at the top of SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
kind of sounds like "this is not the pass you're looking for"...</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>