<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Map New Font Family Names for New URW Fonts Release" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85225#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Map New Font Family Names for New URW Fonts Release" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85225">bug 85225</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:akira@tagoh.org" title="Akira TAGOH <akira@tagoh.org>"> Akira TAGOH</a> <pre>(In reply to Tom Yan from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=85225#c11">comment #11</a>) > As for the order, perhaps it's more about the attitude of you guys towards > the new version. I only know that the new version no longer have cyrillic > glyphs and someone might not like that. Not sure if people are simply not > aware of the new release or they just stick to it on purpose. Aha. that's good to hear that there are some regression in the new version. so fair enough to keep the old one as higher priority. though I guess there are many many improvements in new one. > Though priority doesn't seem matter to me, I hope that fontconfig can at > least support the upstream version. > > Yet IHMO in the long run everyone should switch to upstream version and the > old names should be removed from the fontconfig one day. Definitely. but would be really the long-term item in the to-do.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>