<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Preserve binding when preparing patterns" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90330#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Preserve binding when preparing patterns" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90330">bug 90330</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:freedesktop@behdad.org" title="Behdad Esfahbod <freedesktop@behdad.org>"> Behdad Esfahbod</a> <pre>(In reply to Karl Tomlinson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=90330#c6">comment #6</a>) > (In reply to Behdad Esfahbod from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=90330#c4">comment #4</a>) > > Since bindings are not public API right now, we might as well add a new > > value, so we'd have: > > > > binding=strong -> match > > binding=weak -> approximate > > binding=?? -> fallback > > > > or maybe use weak for fallback and add a semi-strong for approximates. That > > might reduce the number of configurations we would need to adjust. > > The current behavior of families with weak bindings being considered only > after families with strong bindings may be worth remembering here. Right... I'm really hesitant to touch the matcher, but want to address the bigger question of the match-quality this time. Lets hear from Akira as well. If he doesn't have time to work on it, I might give it a try myself.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>