[Fontconfig] FcFontMatch oddities
rvs at Sun.COM
Tue Apr 18 11:44:09 PDT 2006
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 02:02:05PM -0400, Patrick Lam wrote:
> Roman Shaposhnick wrote:
> > The question is quite simple -- it seems that quite explicitly fontconfig
> > doesn't let a client application request an exact set of properties for
> > a font and how this font is supposed to be rendered. Basically, even though,
> > I can do something like:
> > $ xterm -fa 'mono:bgr'
> > and even though at a pattern level ':bgr' gets recognized and passes upstream,
> > when it comes to 'FcFontMatch' everything that has to do with the rendering
> > gets stripped.
> You'll have to ask keithp why this is the case,
Is he reading this list or do I have to Cc him separately ?
> but yes, I believe that
> FcFontMatch only matches on the pattern elements that are explicitly
> listed in _FcMatchers in fcmatch.c, namely foundry, charset, family,
> lang, spacing, pixelsize, style, slant, weight, width, antialias,
> rasterizer, outline and fontversion.
It is not even that FcFontMatch *matches* based on these values
(after all, I'm yet to see a font that has an ability to tell the
world it wants to be rendered in bgr only) but that it doesn't
append or overlay what was explicitly requested on the matching
font pattern. The biggest trouble of all is that when FcFontMatch
is done matching in my particular case the result has 'rgba' set
to 0. Which means -- we don't know, we didn't have an explicit request.
At some level, I would even be happy if such an overlay functionality
was implemented as a separate API (but I don't seem to find it anywhere)
which would let me do something like:
match = FcFontMatch (0, pattern, result);
I guess what I'm really after is a very basic property in every system:
if a client has explicitly requested something -- don't just ignore it
unless there's a good technical reason for that (like the request being
senseless, for example). Right now fontconfig does exactly that -- it
ignores my explicit request (as in 'mono:bgr') and, I guess, I'm still
looking for somebody to explain that 'technical reason' to me ;-)
More information about the Fontconfig