[Fontconfig] [PATCH] never try to validate cache files when
using fc-cache -f
fcrozat at mandriva.com
Fri Feb 3 00:42:43 PST 2006
Le jeudi 02 février 2006 à 14:50 -0500, Patrick Lam a écrit :
> Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 February 2006 18:47, Patrick Lam wrote:
> >> if (!force && FcDirCacheValid (dir) && FcDirCacheHasCurrentArch (dir))
> >>checks for cache validity and ought to ensure that -f will try to save
> >>the cache files. Of course it might fail for some other reason.
> > Hmm, indeed. but I want one switch to make sure no corrupt cache files stay
> > around, as we have way too many problems with them.
> It would be great to have a --really-force flag, then. The man page
> doesn't think about the issues involved in multiarch cache files.
> >>-f works for me. Does it not work for you? What should the semantics
> >>of -f be? Perhaps there should be -f and --really-force, which would
> >>always remove cache files; that's certainly not what we want to give
> >>when we make install.
> > what does make install have to do with it (curious)? Indeed, the normal
> > behaviour whould be to just run "fc-cache" I think.
> make install runs fc-cache -f -v, as I'd imagine postinst scripts would
> as well.
Well, I'm doing fc-cache -f in %post of fontconfig package but older
version of caches are sometime in the way and only rm
-f /var/cache/fontconfig/* can fix it :(
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat at mandriva.com>
More information about the Fontconfig