[Fontconfig] bug status for 2.4 release

[Keith Packard]

On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 12:59 -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> writes:
> 
> >> local.conf should probably also be done that way, then, too.
> 
> Keith> Yes, you're right, although 'local.conf' is fairly deprecated these days
> Keith> with conf.d available.
> 
> Good point.  Perhaps a good time, then, to complete the deprecation?

Ah, perhaps. Although, it's reasonably harmless to continue to include
it, perhaps from a file in conf.d

> Good question.  I see that there is no general consensus among the
> distributions for, as an example, apache setups.  Some use .avail
> and .enabled; some use just .d.  But I rather prefer .avail/.enabled.

I think we're fairly well stuck with 'conf.d' for now, but we can
install our supported configuration files in conf.avail.

Can you get this working for the 2.4 release?

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/attachments/20060903/108de7e2/attachment.pgp