<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Sacrificing collaboration because of the spammers (moving to static pages) seems undesirable :( Are there options to make it more secure? Improving security is probably a good investment.<br><br>(^_^)/<br>mike.<br><br>> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:17:33 -0800<br>> From: alan.coopersmith@oracle.com<br>> To: fontconfig@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> CC: freedesktop@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> Subject: [Fontconfig] Time to kill the fontconfig wiki?<br>> <br>> Looking at http://www.fontconfig.org/wiki/TitleIndex I see it's around<br>> 99.9% pure spam. Other than the front page, virtually everything else<br>> is the moin-moin boilerplate or the hundreds of pages of spam. Even the<br>> Recent Changes & Find Page links have been overwritten by spammers hundreds<br>> of times, with the spammers fighting each other to crap on it most recently.<br>> (I restored them both this week, but expect that to not last long.)<br>> <br>> Would fontconfig be better served by a static web page? (Maybe even one<br>> with, dare I say it, nice fonts?) Or should the wiki just be purged and<br>> set up fresh with greater levels of access control?<br>> <br>> -- <br>>         -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith@oracle.com<br>>          Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Fontconfig mailing list<br>> Fontconfig@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig<br>                                            </body>
</html>