<div dir="ltr">Hi all, I’m a non-Arabic speaker working with Arabic text, and I sometimes see results from log2vis() that don’t look quite right. I have a test where I compare the results from two Arabic text reshapers. The first is pyfribidi which is a thin wrapper around fribidi-0.19.6. The second reshaper is a Python port of this: <a href="https://github.com/agawish/Better-Arabic-Reshaper/">https://github.com/agawish/Better-Arabic-Reshaper/</a> The two reshapers almost always agree on how to reshape a logical word. However, in some cases they don’t. For instance, when given this logical string: u'\u062c\u0627\u0630\u0628\u064a\u0651\u0629' log2vis() puts the Shadda in a different place than the BAR (Better-Arabic-Reshaper): log2vis: u’\ufe94\ufef4\u0651\ufe91\ufeab\ufe8e\ufe9f' bar: u’\ufe94\u0651\ufef4\ufe91\ufeab\ufe8e\ufe9f' When I paste quoted versions of the visual representation of these strings into Google, Google finds 23 instances of the fribidi version and ~37k versions of the BAR version. To me, that’s a pretty strong argument that the fribidi version is incorrect. I’m happy to file a bug if that’s appropriate, but I’d much rather learn that I’m simply misusing the library or making some other mistake. Can someone help me understand what I'm doing wrong? Thanks in advance Philip </div>