replacing libsoup with nanohttp?

Jussi Kukkonen jhkukkon at cc.hut.fi
Tue Aug 21 00:17:02 PDT 2007


Santtu had some valid points here (thanks for the input). Especially
async and https support might be useful at some point -- still, I
decided to try the nanohttp route for this release of maemo packages at
least. Porting was easy (and should be easy if we ever want to go back),
so I think I'll push this change to fd.o if everything seems to work out
fine and no-one has objections.


Some details:
* nanohttp should pick up proxy settings automatically (so the code is
somewhat smaller), but I haven't tested that -- let me know if it
doesn't work.

* soup apparently does some uri escaping itself. With nanohttp one has
to use xmlURIEscapeStr() or similar when user input is accepted.

-jussi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/geoclue/attachments/20070821/4f6593e3/attachment.pgp 


More information about the GeoClue mailing list