[Glamor] very slow 2d with radeonsi and glamor

[Michel Dänzer]

On Fre, 2013-06-14 at 05:14 +0300, Александр wrote:
> В письме от Четверг, 13-июн-2013 11:51:36 пользователь Michel Dänzer написал:
> > On Mit, 2013-06-12 at 22:43 +0300, Александр wrote:
> > > В письме от Среда, 12-июн-2013 11:19:40 пользователь Michel Dänzer 
> написал:
> > > > On Die, 2013-06-11 at 21:43 +0300, Александр wrote:
> > > > > В письме от Вторник, 11-июн-2013 18:42:21 Вы написали:
> > > > > > On Die, 2013-06-11 at 14:41 +0300, Александр wrote:
> > > > > > > i have installed patched glamor, now i do not see any errors in
> > > > > > > log,
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > 2d
> > > > > > > still have problems (unusable slow 2d, artifacts), xorg log
> > > > > > > attached
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > So the problem isn't directly related to those errors. Does the X
> > > > > > server's stderr output contain anything interesting? It's normally
> > > > > > captured in a gdm/kdm/*dm log file.
> > > > > 
> > > > > i am using kde, /var/log/kdm.log contain nothing interesting, i
> > > > > removed
> > > > > old
> > > > > log, started xorg with glamor and captured log, look in attachment,
> > > > > but
> > > > > nothing related to X, glamor, 3d, but i see strange messages in dmesg
> > > > > 
> > > > > [62724.579352] radeon 0000:01:00.0: bo ffff88014db12000 don't has a
> > > > > mapping in vm ffff8802321f2080
> > > > 
> > > > Those are harmless, though a fix for them has been queued for future
> > > > kernels.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Have you tried starting X on only one of your two graphics cards? Does
> > > > that work better?
> > > 
> > > how can i do this without physically removing second card ?
> > 
> > Hmm, actually it looks like X only tries to use one card. Can you set
> > the environment variable EGL_LOG_LEVEL=debug for the Xorg process and
> > provide its stderr output with that?
> > 
> > Out of curiosity, what is the second card for, as you don't seem to want
> > to use it?
> 
> xorg stderr in attachment, if i understand it correctly, problem related to 
> displays configuration in xorg ?

I don't see any obvious problem there. I don't have any good ideas what
the problem could be unfortunately. Did you have a chance to test with
only one card?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                   http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/glamor/attachments/20130705/cfbd56db/attachment.pgp>