[Gstreamer-bugs] [Bug 102128] Changed - [PPC]powerpc asm in gst/gstatomic.h is incorrect

[bugzilla-daemon at widget.gnome.org]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102128

Changed by uraeus at linuxrising.org.

--- shadow/102128	Wed Jan  1 16:05:26 2003
+++ shadow/102128.tmp.29760	Thu Jan 23 09:13:54 2003
@@ -1,22 +1,23 @@
 Bug#: 102128
 Product: GStreamer
 Version: 0.5.0
 OS: other
 OS Details: Debian GNU/Linux sid
-Status: ASSIGNED   
+Status: NEEDINFO   
 Resolution: 
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: gstreamer (core)
 AssignedTo: gstreamer-maint at bugzilla.gnome.org                            
 ReportedBy: walters at verbum.org               
 QAContact: gstreamer-maint at bugzilla.gnome.org
 TargetMilestone: 0.4.0
 URL: 
-Summary: powerpc asm in gst/gstatomic.h is incorrect
+Cc: ds at schleef.org,omega at temple-baptist.com
+Summary: [PPC]powerpc asm in gst/gstatomic.h is incorrect
 
 <omega> wtay: indicating a bug in the memchunk in gst or a bug in the concept?
 <wtay> omega: bug in the ppc implementation
 <omega> ok, good ;-)
 <wtay> x86 impl is rock solid AFAIK
 <wtay> hmm, the assembler path is used.. ds, ds-work?
@@ -25,6 +26,10 @@
 <wtay> I think I badly explained the functions to ds...
 <wtay> walters: well, if you recompile after updating gstatomic.h you have
 a working core...
 <wtay> I'm going to rework it a bit to match libatomic so that ds can do
 the right ppc asm
 <wtay> walters: thanks for making me find this :)
+
+------- Additional Comments From Uraeus at linuxrising.org  2003-01-23 09:13 -------
+Erik and/or David, is this something needing to be fixed before 0.6.0?
+is it here we need libatomic?