[gst-devel] hi-di-ho

[Baker, Steve]

My opinion on these is that they are not doing any harm, and we may want to
add extra behaviour to these functions in the future. For example,
gst_element_set_name could check its parent bin (if it has one) to make sure
the name is unique in that bin.

> On Monday 05 August 2002 12:10, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > please give http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89836 a look.
> > Should I remove gst_element_[sg]et_name ? are there objections ?
> 
> BTW other functions, that duplicate GstObject functions, are:
> gst_element_get_parent (calls gst_object_set_parent)
> gst_element_set_parent (calls GST_OBJECT_PARENT)
> 
> bye...