[gst-devel] threads in 0.7
in7y118 at public.uni-hamburg.de
Wed Dec 10 16:44:01 CET 2003
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> That doesn't need a rewrite. But the point isn't any less valid. ;).
I said it that way because GstQueue needs a rewrite because it's ugly
code (mostly because of the ability of being leaky that a) isn't used and
therefore b) doesn't work) and should have some more signals. People
already discussed that quite some time ago (once when 0.6 was new and
Colin did buffering for iradio and once when someone else who I don't
remember was interested in doing stuff with the queue), but people don'T
like touching ugly parts of the code.
Opt is still segfaulting regularly, too...
More information about the gstreamer-devel