[gst-devel] Re: Comparison: MAS, GStreamer, NMM
mlohse at cs.uni-sb.de
Thu Aug 26 05:03:15 CEST 2004
Matthias Welwarsky wrote:
>This is sort of a minimum requirement. We should seek to make this possible
>with whatever framework is available. Meaning: In KDE, we need an adaptor
>that implements those few, generic use cases, using either MAS, NMM or
>GStreamer, or <plug you favorite candidate here>. This shouldn't be too
>difficult. I volunteer to work on the KDE::PlayObject stuff to make it more
>generic and not expose details about the underlying framework any more, if
>someone else steps up to write drivers for MAS, NMM and GStreamer.
I personally do agree with this approach, e.g. being independent of a
particular multimedia framework is a great feature of amaroK. If this is
the way KDE decides to go, I think we will try to help as much as possible.
Have fun, Marco.
More information about the gstreamer-devel