[gst-devel] Re: dparams roadmap (AKA dparams are dead, long live control pads)

[Torsten Schoenfeld]

On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 13:42 +0100, Edward Hervey wrote:

> [...]

I can't really comment on the proposal itself since I don't know
GStreamer well enough yet.  Just a minor nag:

> gboolean gst_unenvelope_properties (GstEnvelope * envelope,
>                                     GObject * object,
>                                     gchar * first_property_name, ...);

That isn't a good function name.  Function name prefixes should always
match the object the function takes as the first argument.  Otherwise
you break the OO paradigm, and you make it hard for language bindings to
wrap the function in a sane way.

-- 
Bye,
-Torsten