[gst-devel] status of rtp packetizers

[Thomas Vander Stichele]

On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 14:25 -0300, Edgard Lima wrote:
> I have already change the following plugins so they are compliant with 
> the 'todo' proposed.
> Since, apply that changes implies in removing the old ones I would like 
> know if everybody agree with it and I can commit?
> 
> gstrtpg711enc - gstg711payload
> gstrtpg711dec - gstg711depayload
> 
> gstrtpgsmenc - gstgsmpayload
> gstrtpgsmdec - gstgsmdepayload
> 
> gstrtpamrenc - gstamrpayload
> gstrtpamrdec - gstamrdepayload
> 
> gstrtpmpaenc - gstmpapayload
> gstrtpmpadec - gstmpadepayload
> 
> New element: gstspeexpayload and gstspeexdepayload

Hi,

I don't like this idea.  rtp is not the only mechanism that wraps codecs
into a transport layer.  And you're making the names longer without any
benefit.  Personally I have suggested to replace "enc" with "pay" and
"dec" with "depay".

Thomas



Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
Come on baby take a walk with me honey
Tell me who do you love
Who do you love