[gst-devel] Notes on the 0.9 API

[David Schleef]

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:04:26PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> > * GstMiniObject is quite a pain for language bindings because some of
> > the functionality that's usually provided by the GObject wrappers has to
> > be duplicated (for example: memory and inheritance management, callback
> > handling).  I'm not complaining, though.  I understand that
> > GstMiniObject was consciously designed to be efficient, and that GObject
> > just isn't fast enough.  I just thought I'd mention it anyway.
> 
> ACK. But it's better than what we used to have (crack events and
> buffers) while not being huge.

Speaking of crack, did anyone ever convert GstCaps to subclass
GstMiniObject?  Is it worth doing at this late stage?

(I have clearly been concentrating on other projects these last
few months.)



dave...

-- 
David Schleef
Big Kitten LLC (http://www.bigkitten.com/) -- data acquisition on Linux