[gst-devel] [gst-cvs] gst-openmax: .gitignore: ignore more
zaheerabbas at merali.org
Wed Mar 25 23:48:03 CET 2009
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Edward Hervey <bilboed at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'll interpret that as "I don't care", so I went ahead and made the
>> ?? I would rather interpret the following as "I don't care about
> What? From your response one would think that 'not caring' about
> .gitignore was a bad thing. It's not, some people care, some people
> don't. He doesn't, I do... there's nothing inherently wrong with that.
> And now you throw a bunch of stuff that's completely unrelated:
>> * Removing usage of common submodule
> So? What is the impact?
> I'm thinking on adding a script that updates the files I copied from
> 'common' and firing it before making a release. How would that be any
> different from the current situation?
>> * Doing whitespace fixes after that and then suggesting those changes
>> go into common (you could have done it in common from the start)
> I have suggested ways to improve 'common' and those were ignored.
> I don't see why I should put high in my priority list whitespace
> cleanups for something I don't think should even exist (common).
>> * Removing the gst-indent pre-commit
> The only thing that script is doing is ensuring the current code has
> two code-styles. Two code-styles = bad.
>> * Not using the gstreamer indentation style (there's a REASON we use
>> it : it allows much faster reviewing of all gstreamer modules by other
>> GStreamer developers).
> There has been plenty of time to improve gst-openmax, including the
> code-style, and I've never seen any interest in doing that on any
> mailing list.
> Now, the same day you proposed to update the code-style in our
> internal (Nokia) IRC, I came up with a plan to do that without
> disturbing anyone and I made it public on the gst-openmax mailing
> I'm executing that plan, and sent some patches for reviewing.
> I'm also a busy person, and could spend my time doing some other more
> productive stuff, and even though I'm doing exactly I said I would,
> apparently that's not good enough for you.
>> Should we remove gst-openmax from git.freedesktop.org ?
> Is that a threat? Well I'm going to seriously consider that as I
> haven't seen any benefit from being on the 'GStreamer' umbrella at
> all. If anything, it's the other way around, GStreamer has benefited
> because in the embedded community vendors provide OpenMAX IL
> components, not GStreamer.
> Felipe Contreras
This all has blown out of proportion. Felipe, Tim and Edward should go
on irc and discuss the problems with gitignore, code style, common
etc. there and come up with a conclusion and learn to be able to talk
rationally between each other.
More information about the gstreamer-devel