That is it! Reinstaling the new versions, removing totem010, and rhythmbox-0.9.4, which also depends on totem010, nautilus starts fine.<br>So, it seems that the villain of the history is totem010 after all. <br><br>But with the previous versions, everything worked together in peace. But why does nautilus depend on totem? It is kind of non-sense.
<br><br>/Paulo Roma.<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/9/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jan Schmidt</b> <<a href="mailto:thaytan@noraisin.net">thaytan@noraisin.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 11:17 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:<br>> With the set below, if I install the 5 packages I mentioned before,<br>> nautilus<br>> hangs forever (it creates 2 processes),<br>> although rythmbox
0.9 plays fine. It is difficult to track<br>> the problem. I had to use gdb with nautilius. I had no idea nautilus<br>> could ever<br>> depend on gstreamer. But in fact it does. On the other hand, Kde is<br>> completely unaffected.
<br><br>It depends on GStreamer through the totem-properties-page extension, I<br>think. I've no idea how to tell why that extension is hanging nautilus<br>on startup, but moving<br>aside /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions/libtotem-
properties-page.so might<br>help tell if that's the problem.<br><br>Jan.<br><br>--<br>Jan Schmidt <a href="mailto:thaytan@noraisin.net">thaytan@noraisin.net</a><br><br>If Darl McBride had his way, he would have banned marriage too, because
<br>it<br>obviously is against the remunerative interests of prostitutes<br>- Bruce Perens<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>