<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1595" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Hello List,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>thanks for including me. In case you didn't receive my
answer to Edward's mail that I just sent - here it is:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Hi Edward,<BR><BR>thanks for your quick answer. Sorry for not
putting direct questions in my<BR>e-mail. What I wanted to know was if GStreaner
can do all that - and you<BR>addressed all the points. I had the idea that you
could help me because I<BR>found a GStreamer-link and realized, that you and
your team has the<BR>knowledge of all that technical details for my TV station
project.<BR><BR> According to your mail GStreamer can do most of the things
I would like to<BR>do. It can handle even these long stream addresses and all
thinkable<BR>formats. But you only see things without audio, so I can't control
audio<BR>levels.<BR><BR>Yesterday I found vjdirector 1.3 on the net which is
almost like DVmixer but<BR>it can handle stream. Still it crashes as well maybe
due to buffering of the<BR>streams.<BR><BR>The thing I forgot to mention:
Because I'm not able to afford satellite link<BR>up or a microwave truck, I plan
to feed the reports from the correspondents<BR>via MSN or other applications
which allow you to quickly get multi-media<BR>files across. The live reports
should be also provided via streaming video.<BR>I only suppose, if it has to be
pre-renderer or bufferd, there will always<BR>be a lot of dead air before the
correspondent reponds to the anchors in the<BR>studio.<BR><BR>I visited several
dozens of TV stations over the years, and most of them of<BR>course use
expensive hardware - at the moment not possible to afford for a<BR>student
without much money. To make it possible at all I thought it would be<BR>possible
to run this thing from a normal computer. That wouldn't be any<BR>problem if I
only would wanna broadcast recorded content.<BR><BR>Because I 'd like to do at
least one newscast in the beginning and expand on<BR>that after money and
manpower comes in. Anytime a story breaks I would like<BR>to interrupt the
program and take the live coverage of all those local<BR>stations. But living in
Germany non of that is available via normal<BR>satellite or cabe channels. The
only way to get it is via internet-streams.<BR>That would give me an advantage
to all those other german channels who are<BR>not very quick to react. If they
are quick they take CNN Europe or Sky News<BR>which in return has to take their
footage from CNN USA and Fox News. These<BR>steps in between let German media
always look one step behind.<BR><BR>Let me set the scene - local television here
in Leipzig<BR><BR>Local coverage on the other hand is very limited. Most
stations - especially<BR>in East germany only have one daily "newscast" which is
nothing compared<BR>with English speaking countries. It is a mixture of "paid
for-" or PR<BR>reports and service content, limiting the actual news to 1ß
minutes. All<BR>looks very amateurish. And the 30 sec weather forecast is the
biggest joke<BR>on earth. Any English speaking television viewer would shake his
head or die<BR>laughing. In the field of graphics and titles they learned a bit
during the<BR>last years so at least that doesn't look as home-made as it used
to look.<BR>But still they have neither time and temperature, nor crawl titles
or even<BR>animated backgrounds. The live content is limited to half an hour to
one<BR>hour a day plus two hours pre-recorded. The rest of our local
channel<BR>Leipzig Fernsehen's content is filled with re-runs of these daily 3
hours<BR>plus paid-for call in game shows where stupid people spend 2 Euros a
minute<BR>tryin to call but nobody is let through. If there is no 9live during
the<BR>night they show soft-porn and telephone sex commercials.<BR><BR>You see -
if I quickly could build an audience online and than apply for a<BR>license,
this thing wouldn't be the biggest competition on earth.<BR><BR>The state
sponsored public broadcaster MDR of course has a wider coverage<BR>area and a
bigger budget and that really shows. OK, ther is no morning news,<BR>now news
later than 10PM, no breaking news and stuff. But being a full<BR>service TV
station it is no news channel anyway. But as it is for national<BR>TV, MDR is
very slow to react - even to stories happening in the prime<BR>broadcast area.
MDR serves the German states of Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt and<BR>thueringen and is
available nationally and also across Europe via<BR>satellite - just like the
local BBCs in the UK.<BR><BR>The demand for a information oriented channel which
provides real news and<BR>which is quick to react to breaking stories is there.
I have no research to<BR>provide numbers, but all of the students for example
never watch LF or a lot<BR>of MDR. They say, LF is too bad and MDR is for old
people. And all those<BR>people who really work would like to have something
uptodate. That's why the<BR>news radio MDR Info fills the information gap left
by MDR TV very well. So I<BR>guess a TV channel doing the same thing would get
even more attention.<BR><BR>Is GStreamer a stand alone application in windows or
does that still have to<BR>be written?<BR><BR>SCENARIO:<BR>I think I need three
computers for news-input<BR>1. switches between the (at least) 4 Studio
cameras<BR>2. has the correspondents or outside live shots<BR>3 has the breaking
news livestreams<BR><BR>I already have created an American local TV weather
animation file with<BR>Scala Info Channel Designer. In order to superimpose that
on the green<BR>screen do I have to do it before I feed the wheather-anchor's
studio cam<BR>into the camera-inputs computer or later?<BR><BR>Computer 4 is the
master control input of the 3 above - or 4 if I do weather<BR>on a seperate one.
That is the one that hold the intros, titles and
animated<BR>backgrounds.<BR>Computer 5 scales and encodes the content in windows
media for the internet<BR>and mpeg2 for broadcast.<BR><BR>Would this scenario
work? Or is there a way to do it with less computers? Do<BR>I lose quality by
doing that? Is it possibe to feed the material from the 3<BR>inputs as "raw
video-out" unencoded into the fourth?<BR>How much memory, CPU-power and what big
a harddrive do should each of the<BR>computers have?<BR><BR>Thanks again for
your help<BR>Juergen</FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>-----------------------------------------------<BR>Leipzig
News Service<BR>c/o Juergen Theil<BR>W.-Zipperer-Str. 63<BR>04177
Leipzig<BR>Germany</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Phone: +49-3221-2615237 <BR>Mobile: +49-178-5429861
<BR>MSN: <A
href="mailto:leipzignews@hotmail.com">leipzignews@hotmail.com</A><BR>ICQ:
298068847<BR><A
href="http://myspace.com/leipzignews">http://myspace.com/leipzignews</A><BR>-------------------------------------------------</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>