<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Erik Andrén <<a href="mailto:erik.andren@gmail.com">erik.andren@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Recording in a lower resolution should lower the cpu requirements.</blockquote></div> True, but that's only if he is able to do that. In my applications, recorded resolution and feature quality are dictated to me by regulation, so that wouldn't be an option. But at the least I suppose one could publish that tip as a possible workaround for the users (after verifying with some testing on those low-power units). I also agree with the suggestion of trying a different encoding/encoder. $0.02, E. Westbrook