Seems to me that this is what betas and release candidates are for. Cut a tarball, but don't bless it as stable. See what you get, then call it good if it is. $0.02, E. Westbrook <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jan Schmidt <<a href="mailto:thaytan@noraisin.net">thaytan@noraisin.net</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi all, Daniel Siegel has been poking me here at GCDS about getting a first release tarball of gst-plugins-gl out the door so he can finally start using it in Cheese. I wanted to see how you all feel about it - whether you think it is in good enough shape to cut a 0.10.1 tarball, even if it doesn't yet provide the kind of interface guarantees that our stable modules do? If noone thinks it's a bad idea, I propose to just roll up a tarball and push it ASAP, then look at integrating gst-plugins-gl into the regular release schedule, probably alongside gst-plugins-good/gst-plugins-bad. Cheers, Jan.</blockquote></div>