<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Donny Viszneki wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:AANLkTimZID0YFCeTeijumBUBCKuELfcmHSFhhQ2g4PDn@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Martin Bisson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:martin.bisson@gmail.com"><martin.bisson@gmail.com></a> wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">You're right, this makes more sense...  I've started to experiment with the 3 new caps I've mentioned, but it would be simpler/better to use that layout.  It would still avoid the compatibility problems with elements that currently handle video/x-raw-yuv. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> You still may need an intervening element to deinterlace the stereo video stream for existing elements that handle video/x-raw-yuv. Interleaved (including side-by-side and top-bottom) video complicates the identification of adjacent pixels. Not all elements can simply pass off interleaved stereo video as non-stereo video. A naive blur filter applied to side-by-side and top-bottom interleaved stereo video would result in blurring together each channel's adjacent edges. Row-by-row interleaved video would be destroyed! </pre> </blockquote> I agree.  See David's e-mail or my reply to his e-mail that I just sent.  We would need an element to make "regular" video out of a stereo video.<br> </body> </html>