Thanks Stefan.<br><br>I am not familiar with OSS license, but I know the LGPL has "Redistribute" feature. That means if some commercial products have integrated it, we can use it freely and safety according "Redistribute". <br>
<br>By my search on google, I find maemo5 and Fedora have integrated gst-plugin-bad, so by my understanding, it should be ok for me too on gst-plugin-bad. <br><br>From gstreamer website, it describes gst-plugin-bad not like gst-plugin-ugly.<br>
<br><span style="color: rgb(51, 102, 255);">"GStreamer Ugly Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that have good quality and correct
functionality, but distributing them might pose problems. The license on
either the plug-ins or the supporting libraries might not be how we'd like. The
code might be widely known to present patent problems.
"</span><br><br><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255);">"
GStreamer Bad Plug-ins is a set of plug-ins that aren't up to par compared to
the rest. They might be close to being good quality, but they're missing
something - be it a good code review, some documentation, a set of tests, a
real live maintainer, or some actual wide use.
"</span><br><br>Seems gst-plugin-bad has no license issues but not good quality than gst-plugin-ugly.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/4/21 Stefan Kost <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ensonic@hora-obscura.de">ensonic@hora-obscura.de</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">Liang Zhao wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> Could someone help me on aacparse and amrparse license in<br>
> gst-plugin-bad? I want to integrate these 2 elements into our product,<br>
> but I don't know whether the LGPL is the license issue?<br>
<br>
</div>You find the lices stated in the plugin and also at thye top of the<br>
source files. It is up to you to decide wheter LGPL is fine for you or not.<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> I find in maemo5 SDK ARMEL binary, they are integrated into it, and<br>
> marked as LGPL, does that mean I can use it freely and safely on law?<br>
> I also find no mp3parse and asfdemux in it, does that mean it is have<br>
> issues on the LGPL license? or I need to re-implement it with<br>
> proprietary license.<br>
</div>mp3parse should be fine as LGPLK and should be moved out<br>
gst-plugins-ugly. for asf you find licese details on microsoft webpages.<br>
<br>
Stefan<br>
<br>
><br>
> Thanks<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> BRs.<br>
> Zhao Liang<br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Gstreamer-embedded mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Gstreamer-embedded@lists.sourceforge.net">Gstreamer-embedded@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-embedded" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-embedded</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gstreamer-embedded mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gstreamer-embedded@lists.sourceforge.net">Gstreamer-embedded@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-embedded" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-embedded</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Zhao Liang<br><br>No.1 Wang Jing East Road Chao Yang District <br>Beijing, 100102 China<br>+86-10-84733698<br>