[RFC] Add persistent storage capability to HAL

[Matthew Garrett]

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:10:38PM -0700, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> I haven't looked very closely at the code, but conceptually it sounds 
> like a cache. Which brings up all the standard question with resspect to 
> caching: how is it kept up to date, how and when is it invalidated, etc.

hald itself shouldn't read or write this. It's intended for addons, 
which should then set policy themselves by ensuring that they have 
enough information available to determine whether the persistent objects 
are useful.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org