Safe to disable HAL?

David Zeuthen david at fubar.dk
Wed Jan 25 09:01:17 PST 2006


On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 17:45 -0500, Jared Sutton wrote:
> I'm helping manage the Computer Science lab at a private University. 
> We're dual-booting FC4/WinXP on all of the workstations, and upon 
> upgrading to KDE 3.5 over the Christmas holiday, we found that KDE now 
> auto-detects USB mass-storage devices that are plugged in, and mounts 
> them.  We've had a system set up for this very thing, and we don't 
> really have a need to change it (when it works well, why change?), so 
> we'd like to disable this new action for all users.  I've discovered the 
> easiest way to do this is to disable the haldaemon service in FC4.  I 
> just wanted to make sure that disabling this service won't upset any 
> other delicate processes in Fedora.  However, there isn't a whole lot of 
> info about HAL scattered about the net.  Anyone have any thoughts?

I don't think much else than storage management and NetworkManager in
FC4 depends on HAL. In FC5 power management will depend on it too.

HTH,
David




More information about the hal mailing list