The HAL Spec
david at fubar.dk
Mon May 8 09:46:30 PDT 2006
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 17:41 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 12:06 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > 1. I really dunno if it's helpful having a separate spec document
> > because we all (myself in particular) suck at updating it. Maybe
> > it would be useful to have a self-documenting scheme a'la gconf
> > where the description of the property is just meta-data for the
> > property but that is a bit far out
> I think hal-spec.xml.in should be broken up into little, easy to add
> for example:
> Then we can easy match up what we've done and fix the spec section by
> section (ripping out the old bits too).
This is way too fine-grained for my taste; how about a division where
- physical namespaces
- functional namespaces
and maybe a bit more; something like 4-5 files is the maximum before it
gets too complicated for me. Suggestions?
> David, if you agree this is the best route forward, I would be happy to
> start splitting up the hal-spec.xml.in file (exams finish on Thursday --
That would be much appreciated! Good luck on the exams!
More information about the hal